Roblox Jailbreak Trading Network: Volt 4x4 (Vehicle) Value Changes

Volt 4x4
Volt 4x4 (Vehicle) From Roblox Jailbreak | Sourced From JailbreakTradingNetwork.com
  • - Poll Results: Decrease: 1 | Keep: 21 | Increase: 21 | Total Participants: 40.
  • - Regular Volt 4x4 (Vehicle) value remained unchanged at $5,500,000.
  • - Duped Volt 4x4 (Vehicle) value remained unchanged at $5,250,000.

Explanation: The community poll for the Volt 4x4 resulted in a decision to “Keep Current Value,” maintaining its trading value at $5,500,000 due to a convergence of factors reflecting both its legacy and current market dynamics within Jailbreak Trading. As a limited, seasonal vehicle awarded as the grand prize for Season 3: “Looking Back,” the Volt 4x4 commands historical prestige and exclusivity, with only 886 copies distributed in the last month and a modest but active trading frequency of 4,046 trades. Its performance metrics—particularly a top speed of roughly 250 MPH and the capacity for all-terrain traversal—make it versatile, though its acceleration remains only average for its class. The demand rating, while not especially high at 4.57 out of 10, signals consistent low-to-moderate interest, indicating that while not a “must-have,” the Volt 4x4 remains relevant to collectors and traders seeking unique, multi-functional vehicles. Recent discussions in the Jailbreak Trading community highlight tempered expectations regarding its performance, with experienced players noting that, despite rumors, it does not rival the original Volt’s speed but maintains a solid B-tier status, offering balanced capabilities rather than excelling in any singular aspect. The existence of a duped value at $5,250,000, only slightly below the trading value, further suggests there is no major inflation or deflation pressure currently affecting the market. In light of these balanced factors—steady but unspectacular demand, a stable supply, no significant recent buffs or nerfs, and a lack of major trading volatility—the consensus was to retain the current value, as neither market enthusiasm nor scarcity justified an adjustment at this time. This outcome reflects the community’s desire for gradual, evidence-based value shifts rather than reactive changes, particularly for legacy items with stable trading profiles.

Comments